If you know anything about fallacies, you’ve probably heard of false equivalence. This fallacy occurs frequently in casual arguments and formal debates. False equivalence is when you compare two unlike things to make a point. While usually you want to avoid fallacies, let me explain why this one might actually be a useful tool. Let’s […]
7 Debate Tactics You Probably Don’t Use (but Should)
This is a guest post by Isaiah McPeak of Ethos Debate. I’ve been coaching debate since 2003. Tactics and strategies have come in and out of style. Giovanni asked me to identify some tactics that are underused right now but should be used more often. Here’s what I came up with! Hope it helps 🙂 […]
Book Gleaning — Made to Stick
Book gleaning is a series of posts that highlight specific books and what we can take from them to apply to public speaking. In this post, we’ll be discussing the book Made to Stick, by Chip and Dan Heath. Why do some ideas thrive while others die? And how do we improve the chances of […]
Phrases — Common misunderstanding
When you’ve been running your affirmative case for a while, you have a pretty good mastery of all the possible arguments that may be run against your case. (Although you may be occasionally surprised by the… creative… arguments people come up with from time to time). There are some arguments, however, that always seem to […]
Taking the moral high-ground
How do you beat a case that seems to be backed up completely by a value that the judge can’t disagree with? How do you defeat a case if it’s trying to reduce terrorism and you seem to be supporting terrorism with your position? I’m going to give you a quick crash course in taking […]
Pretend you’re winning
On October 7, 1984, Ronald Reagan obliterated the main opposition to his presidency. Rumors had been circulating that he was too old for the job, and that he was getting Alzheimer’s. During a debate with his opponent, Walter Mondale, he quipped “I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going […]
Cross-Examination: Question bluff
All credit goes to Simon Sefzik for coming up with this Cross-Examination tip. The question bluff is a way of getting the other team to impact your arguments for you. Here’s an example: Situation: Affirmative mandate unintentionally alienates, say, Iran. It’s in an effort to get Iran to stop their nuclear program, and their plan is […]
“You may be thinking…”
Here’s a cool phrase you can use in order to address any concerns that the judge has. I often used this phrase when I already knew what the judge’s objection would likely be. For example, “The result of all this is nuclear war. Now I know what you might be thinking—is that really likely? Surprisingly, […]
Emphasis by positioning
When you need to make a point stand out in a judge’s mind, it’s time to pull out all stops and give them the best you have. One technique I seldom see used is positioning in order to emphasize key points. How it’s done Before I begin, this is not to be overused. Someone who […]
Repetition vs. refutation
If you’ve debated long enough, you’ve probably heard the catchphrase “repetition is not refutation!” thrown around casually by debaters. It seems to be their go-to response to arguments they don’t know what to do with. Even though the phrase is often misused, it is even more frequently and unfortunately true—too many people get in […]