• Twitter
  • Facebook

Potent Speaking

Impress the audience

  • Home
  • About
  • Coaching
  • Videos
  • Resources
    • Brief template
    • eBook – 5 useful debate drills
    • Speaker point spreadsheet
    • Sample visualization
    • Debate lingo replacement chart

Crack a lame joke

10Oct

October 10, 2014 by PotentSpeaking 4 Comments

Post Summary

Summary

Humor is extremely useful for speeches. Here are 5 reasons why.

1) Humor creates a connection with the judge.

2) It makes you seem more approachable and real.

3) It improves attention span.

4) It makes your speech more memorable.

5) Humor can sway opinions. If the judge disagrees with you, but you can make them laugh, it will start to disarm them.

Main Takeaways

– Don’t use story-line jokes, use witty remarks or one-liners.

– Don’t always use jokes at the beginning of speeches, although one speech that starts with a joke is often good.

– Have a backup if the joke flops. Eg. “That sounded funnier to me back at the table”.

– The reason I wrote “crack a lame joke” is because even a lame joke sounds funny in a serious debate round. (Exception: cynical judges, usually debate alumni, do not react well to cheesy humor).

– The idea behind jokes is not to convince the judge you’re funny, it is to connect.

– Don’t worry if the judge doesn’t react boisterously, many believe they’re not supposed to. Then they write on the ballot that they thought you were hilarious.

 

Obama-laughingIt is common advice in the speaking realm to crack a joke to start off your speech. While this can be true to a certain extent, it has grown to a point where it sounds like a template.

But I do advise you to crack jokes in your speeches. In fact, if you look back at the title, I said lame jokes! So, wait a minute, why would you want to tell a lame joke? Here’s why.

The art of jokes in speeches

Before explaining the whole lame joke fiasco, let me set up some ground rules for joke telling.

….

Actually, before that. I’m not a super funny person. I’m not going to teach you how to be funny, cause if I could, I would teach myself. I’m just going to talk about joke telling in debate.

When I talk about a “joke”, I am generally talking more about a witty remark or a quick line, not a story-line joke. Story-line jokes in debate are a bad idea 90% of the time. Not only does it take time, it’s just awkward. Leave those for the ballot party.

In case you were thinking of searching Google for “middle east jokes” and dropping them in round, please close that tab and rethink everything.

Story jokes give a cheesy impression, while witty remarks shine a better light on you as a speaker.

Reasons why you should employ humor in your speeches:

1) Humor creates a connection with the judge. Even if they only smirk, or their eye twinkles, you’ve connected to the judge.

2) It makes you seem more approachable and real. Debaters too often seem like plastic. It also makes the judge associate feeling happy with you.

3) Debate can be hard to watch to an untrained observer, so this helps with their attention span.

4) It makes your speech more memorable.

5) Humor can sway opinions. If the judge disagrees with you, but you can make them laugh, it will start to disarm them. That’s why I always told jokes when my brother was mad at me 🙂

Vary it up. Don’t always use jokes at the beginning of your speeches, since it will look like a template. At the same time, starting one speech with a joke might be good because it sets up success for the rest of the speech.

Having a few ideas of jokes that you can start speeches with is a good idea.

Have a backup statement if the joke flops.

In an outround at Regionals, I tried to paint a funny picture of the affirmative team proposing their plan in Congress (there’s too much context I can’t add here), but it got a very quiet reception. So I just said “that was supposed to be funny”, got laughs, and moved on.

Honestly, I think it is better to make a dumb joke and make a humorous recovery than to not attempt the joke in the first place, since it makes you seem approachable. You want the judge to be impressed by your speaking, but also like you as a person.

This brings me to the answer to the question on your mind. Why a lame joke?

Because in the serious context of a debate round, any kind of humorous remark seems funny, even if it isn’t. The point is not to convince the judge that you’re funny, but to connect with them at a human level. That’s pretty much the only reason I survived debate 😉

Of course, if you have the choice of a funny joke or a lame joke, go with the funny one. But I wrote the title “Crack a lame joke” because I want you as the reader to realize that pretty much anything will suffice. It doesn’t have to be tremendously clever.

Notable exception: cynical people, for example a lot of debate alumni, will not like cheesy humor. Tread carefully.

Don’t be ashamed or intimidated if the judge doesn’t react as boisterously as you would have liked. Sometimes judges think they’re supposed to be completely stone-faced the entire round, and then you find out from their ballot that they loved you and thought you were hilarious.

Conclusion

Stop being so serious.

Seriously.

Some debaters look like they’re debating at a funeral. You should be happy when you hit a team like that—it means the judge will like you more.

Just a heads up, at some point I plan to write up some generic jokes you can use for different situations. Get an update when that happens (and when more tips are posted) by signing up for my email list below!

Subscribe here

Main Takeaways

 

Filed Under: Advanced, Engagement, Intermediate, Persuasive techniques Tagged With: Advanced, debate, Intermediate, Jokes, NCFCA, speech, Stoa, tips, tricks

Share this article!

Tweet
Pin It now!
Buffer

Related Posts

  • Baby drawing line in the sandDrawing a line in the sand using false equivalence
  • Debate traditions that you need to drop
  • 7 Debate Tactics You Probably Don’t Use (but Should)
  • Book Gleaning — Made to Stick
  • Making an Affirmative response sheet

Comments

  1. Matthew says

    October 10, 2014 at 10:48 pm

    Three things,

    1. Excellent post! I liked the way it was written and enjoyed it thoroughly.

    2. I look forward to the list of pre-written humor! Honestly us non-witty guys need to stick together.

    3. Interested in writing for a sourcebook?

    Reply
    • PotentSpeaking says

      October 11, 2014 at 7:48 am

      Hi Matthew, thanks!

      Yes, it’s a hard life. 🙂

      Sorry, but I’m too busy to write for a sourcebook right now.

      Good luck!

      Reply
  2. John Mark says

    December 16, 2014 at 8:37 am

    In my opinion, for the little it’s worth, jokes can be more effective in outrounds. If you tell a joke to a judge they might feel that it is their duty to keep a calm demeanor. The other team might smile broadly or perhaps stifle a laugh, and your partner might smile, but laughter is the natural response to humor. If there isn’t laughter, then it could diminish the effect of the joke. I save the few jokes I have for outrounds when they will appear fresh and there will be an audience who won’t have a problem laughing. If the rest of the room is laughing, everyone is more at ease and the judge will feel good about enjoying the joke. At the same time, if the Joke is awful, then it can really burst your bubble.
    Also, if the other team started off with a great joke in their speeches, don’t try to respond with humor of your own (unless you are naturally funny or have a joke that is much better). It will appear very forced and ungenuine to the judge and can steal your own thunder. In other words, don’t remind the judge of the superiority in humor of the other team ☺.
    Also, nice job on the blog. I enjoy it.

    Reply
    • PotentSpeaking says

      December 16, 2014 at 9:30 am

      Thanks John, I agree. Outrounds tend to magnify the effect of jokes. I was still able to crack some jokes in regular rounds (I did that a lot at Nats), and even if the judge doesn’t laugh they end up liking you and writing comments about your humor, etc. (Only a couple of judges didn’t like the humor, but it was my fault for joking with a very serious looking fellow.)

      As for opponents telling jokes: yeah pretty much, if you don’t have something better to say, just avoid the issue. But you can certainly make a comment about their humor like “I wish I was half as entertaining as [name], but all I have is serious things to say.” If you say that with a smile, the judge will acknowledge it and you can move on. That’s not just me speaking, the #1 speaker Russia year used to do that.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Newsletter

Subscribe here

Recent Posts

  • Drawing a line in the sand using false equivalence
  • Debate traditions that you need to drop
  • 7 Debate Tactics You Probably Don’t Use (but Should)
  • Book Gleaning — Made to Stick
  • Making an Affirmative response sheet

Categories

  • Advanced
  • Analogies
  • Basics
  • Body language
  • Confidence
  • Cross-Examination
  • Delivery/Conduct
  • Emphasis
  • Engagement
  • Ethics
  • Evidence
  • Intermediate
  • Interview
  • Introduction
  • Judge interaction
  • Mental tips
  • Motivation
  • Novice
  • Organization
  • Persuasive techniques
  • Phrases
  • Preparation
  • Refutation
  • Round strategy
  • Tournaments
  • Uncategorized
  • Voice
  • Word choice

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Portlight on Genesis Framework · WordPress